Spare a thought for the judge in Donald Trump’s hush-money trial. Justice Juan Merchan has gone from holding the former president in contempt of court… to telling Trump’s defense they probably should have objected more during Stormy Daniels’ testimony.
Guest: Jeremy Stahl, Slate’s jurisprudence editor.
Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Amicus Opinionpalooza: The Supreme Court End-of-Term Breakfast Table
A Word: No Justice. No Peace. No Way Back?
Political Gabfest: Trump Is So Immune
What Next: A Mom's Fight for a Fair Opioid Settlement
What Next: How Bad is the Trump Immunity Ruling?
Amicus Opinionpalooza: The Day SCOTUS Became President
Amicus Opinionpalooza: SCOTUS and MAGA’s Shared Vision For Government Comes Into View
Political Gabfest: A Law Trapped In Amber
Amicus: Rahimi and The Roberts Court’s All New, Also Old, Second Amendment Doctrine
What Next: Homelessness Before the Supreme Court
What Next TBD: The FBI Made a Phone Network. It Was A Trap.
Amicus Opinionpalooza: SCOTUS Says Yes to Bump Stocks, No to Gun Safety Regulation
What Next: Hunter Biden’s Judgment Day
Amicus: The Supreme Court’s Appeal to Heaven
Political Gabfest: Will Trump’s Conviction Help Biden?
What Next: It’s Supreme Court Blockbuster Season
What Next: Election Workers in the Crosshairs
Amicus: Will the Supreme Court Step Into Trump’s Hush Money Conviction?
A Word: Not So Smooth Criminal
Amicus SPECIAL: Trump Guilty on All 34 Counts
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Slow Burn
Slate Debates
What Next | Daily News and Analysis
Decoder Ring
Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts