SUPREME COURT WEIGHS NEW ELECTION EVIDENCE

Now before the Supreme Court is a petition to decide whether or not voting machines can constitutionally provide a secure and accurate vote. The top court initially dismissed the original filing in August 2022 and two months later 60% of the machines failed in the election, rejecting 7,000 ballots every half hour from 6:30 am until 8 pm. It was a disaster. Conservative attorney Kurt Olsen, representing Kari Lake and Mark Finchem, has stunning new evidence in his effort to reopen the case. Olsen discovered that lower courts relied on false statements that machines and software had been tested and certified. His new evidence shows the software was altered before both the 2020 and 2022 elections. Olsen says election officials in Arizona tested 5 spare machines that were never used in the election instead of testing actual machines used. The defendants misrepresented to the courts that machines were using approved software. Olsen says that was false. He says his evidence shows not only were they using altered software, officials were not performing required accuracy testing on machines which will still be used in the 2024 election. Olsen’s says his third discovery is that Dominion machines leave master encryption keys unprotected on the election database. Olsen says that means any malicious actor can take control of the system, insert whatever information they want and make it look like they’re official results without detection. Olsen says this is a stunning breech of security. Olsen says Dominion claims his charges are implausible.

GUEST: CONSERVATIVE ATTORNEY, KURT OLSEN

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.