A small group of professional engineers are using the licensing process to stifle calls for reform and retaliate against Strong Towns for its advocacy.
The Strong Towns organization advocates for reforming the way we build our cities, especially the approach that many professional engineers take with transportation and infrastructure systems. Our critiques of engineers include our video “Conversation with an Engineer,” our many statements on the way engineering organizations advocate for state and federal funding, and our assertion that engineers are often grossly negligent in their street designs when it comes to their treatment of people walking and biking.
This September, Wiley & Sons will publish Confessions of a Recovering Engineer: A Strong Towns Approach to Transportation, a book written by Charles Marohn that is deeply critical of the standard approach to transportation used by many American engineers.
While there are a growing number of engineers that support the kind of reforms Strong Towns advocates for, there are some who do not want this message to be heard. These entrenched engineers often attack reformers — sometimes in very personal ways — to create a high cost for anyone who dares speak out about current practices.
Now, for the second time, a professional engineer has filed a complaint with the state licensing board alleging that the writing, speaking, and advocacy for reform of Charles Marohn—the founder and president of Strong Towns—constitutes a violation of Minnesota law.
The first time this happened, the licensing board dismissed the complaint. This time, board members are actively participating in the attempt to slander Marohn and the Strong Towns movement.
To halt this injustice and protect the right of licensed engineers to speak freely in public forums, Strong Towns has filed a complaint in federal district court against the Minnesota Board of Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture, Geoscience, and Interior Design (commonly called the Board of Licensure) and the individual members of the Board that are participating in this action.
The complaint holds that the Board of Licensure, and these individual members, have violated Marohn’s First Amendment right to free speech and that their enforcement action is an unlawful retaliation against Marohn and Strong Towns for their protected speech.
A copy of the complaint is available at www.strongtowns.org/SupportReform.
“I am saddened that Strong Towns has been forced to take this action,” said Marohn from his office in Brainerd, Minnesota. “I believe that engineers need to be licensed, but engineers also need to be able to speak their conscience without having their license and their livelihood threatened. The Board’s actions are an injustice to all Minnesotans and, if left unchallenged, will have a chilling effect on speech within the engineering profession.”
Suburban Redevelopment Requires Patience, Engagement and a Positive Attitude
2018 Strongest Town Contest Championship
Strongest Town Contest Round 3: Annapolis, MD
Strongest Town Contest Round 3: Kent, OH
Strongest Town Contest Round 3: Muskegon, MI
Strongest Town Contest Round 3: Pensacola, FL
"They're walking away from it and tearing it down."
The Week Ahead: Strong Citizens and Safe Streets
The Week Ahead: Welcome to the 2018 Strongest Town Contest
The Week Ahead: Becoming an Accidental Urbanist
A Conversation with Walkability Expert, Jeff Speck
The Week Ahead: Gentrification and the Bias Towards Bigness
Our streets should be safe for everyone — yes, even those who are under the influence.
In the Amazon HQ2 Contest, the Winner Might Actually be the Loser
The Week Ahead: Kickin it in Kansas City
Our Take on Trump's Leaked Infrastructure Plan
The Week Ahead: A Town Well Planned
Design Speed is a Value Statement
The New Localism
The Week Ahead: The Difference Between a Street and a Road
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
City Manager Unfiltered
Potencial Americano
The ASIC Podcast
The Chris Plante Show
Red Eye Radio