The latest CAN is one of our brand-new 'revision editions' -- brief podcasts aimed at covering the essentials of critical appraisal for medical students and junior doctors preparing for exams.
With the help of Gregory Yates, an academic doctor based in Manchester, this episode introduces two core concepts: sensitivity and specificity. These are two ways of thinking about the accuracy of a diagnostic test. Knowing the sensitivity and specificity of an investigation will give you a decent idea of how it should be used in the emergency department.
Sensitivity (Sn) describes the chance that a test will be positive if your patient has the condition you're testing for. Some people call it the 'true positive rate' or alternatively the positivity in disease (PID) rate. If you need a hand remembering it, you can always remember that PID is a sensitive issue.
Meanwhile, specificity (Sp) considers the chance of a test being negative if the patient doesn't have the condition you're testing for. It's the 'true negative rate' or alternatively the negativity in health (NIH) rate. There are times when we particularly need a test to have a high sensitivity. This is generally when we want to be particularly confident that a test accurately identifies everyone with the relevant condition because we really don't want to miss it. We need a high sensitivity to rule out disease. (Sn-uff it out). At other times, we need to be confident that a patient with a positive test actually has the disease - for example, if the treatment is unpleasant or involves exposing patients to risk. In that case, we want a high specificity to rule in disease. (Sp-in it in).
In this CAN, we use D-Dimer as an example of a very sensitive investigation: it’s positive in nearly 100% of cases of venous thromboembolism. Specificity describes the likelihood that the test will be negative if your patient does not have the disease. We use HbA1c as an example of a highly specific investigation: it’s rarely used in the emergency department, but if it’s elevated, we can be almost certain that the patient is diabetic. HbA1c is almost never (
Ep 89 - March 2017 Round Up
Ep 88 - ED transfers. Patient, Preparation and People.
Ep 87 - Critical Appraisal Nugget 6: Retrospective and Prospective studies
Ep 86 - Critical Appraisal Nugget 5: Journal Clubs
Ep 85 - Top tips for chest drains.
Ep 84 - Critical Appraisal Nugget 4: Intention to Treat
Ep 83 - The Teaching Course in NYC Round Up
Ep 82 - Apparent Life Threatening Events in Babies
Ep 81 - Difficult Conversations with Children in Critical Care with Liz Crowe
Ep 80 - EuSEM Half Time Talk
Ep 79 - Critical Appraisal Nugget: Selection Bias
Ep 78 - Intro to EM: Upper GI bleeding
Ep 77 - Critical Appraisal Nugget 2: Blinding and Masking in clinical trials
Ep 76 - Communication workshop with Liz Crowe (SMACC DUB)
Ep 75 - Critical Appraisal Nugget 1: Randomisation
Ep 74 - ED Handover in the resus room: A panel discussion at SMACC DUB. (Part 2)
Ep 73 - ED Handover in the resus room: A panel discussion at SMACC DUB. (Part 1)
Ep 72 - Wellbeing with Liz Crowe
Ep - 71 SMACC Dublin Day 3 Round Up
Ep - 70 SMACC Dublin Day 2 Round Up.
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Good Nurse Bad Nurse
The Relaxback UK Show
On Call With Dr. Anselm Anyoha
The Peter Attia Drive
The Doctor’s Farmacy with Mark Hyman, M.D.