#343: China and National Security

Discover

Podcast Features
Your all-in-one podcasting solution.

Blog to Podcast
Turn your blog into an engaging podcast.
Livestream
High-performing audio live, without limits.

Podcast Studio
Easy-to-use audio recorder app.
Podbean AI
AI-Enhanced Audio Quality and Content Generation.

Podcast App
The best podcast player & podcast app.

Ads Marketplace
Join Ads Marketplace to earn money
through sponsorship on your podcast.

PodAds
Manage your ads with dynamic ad insertion capability.
Apple Podcasts Subscriptions Integration
Effortlessly publish and manage exclusive episodes for your
Apple Podcasts subscribers directly from Podbean.
Live Streaming
Receive livestream rewards from your audience and earn
recurring income from your Fan Club membership.

All Arts Business Comedy Education
Fiction Government Health & Fitness History Kids & Family
Leisure Music News Religion & Spirituality Science
Society & Culture Sports Technology True Crime TV & Film
Live

How to Start a Podcast
How to Start a Live Podcast
How to Monetize a podcast
How to Promote Your Podcast
How to Use Group Recording

Log in
Start your podcast for free

Podcasting
Monetization
Advertisers
Enterprise
Pricing
Discover

Tech Policy Podcast

Technology

#343: China and National Security

2023-04-24

iOS

Android Share

What does China’s rise as a tech power mean for American national security? Jimmy Quinn, a writer for National Review, joins the show to discuss. He and Corbin debate the merits of a TikTok ban, c...

What does China’s rise as a tech power mean for American national security? Jimmy Quinn, a writer for National Review, joins the show to discuss. He and Corbin debate the merits of a TikTok ban, consider the new House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, and explore other aspects of the recent uptick in Sino-American competition. For more, follow Jimmy’s work at National Review Online. Also, check out Tech Policy Podcast #337: China and Domestic Surveillance.

Correction: At 17:30, Corbin refers to “Senator Warren.” For once, he did not, in fact, mean to criticize Senator Elizabeth Warren. His intended target was Senator Mark Warner.