Two recent major podcast themes - section 3 of the fourteenth amendment, and judicial ethics - echoed through the news this past week. Wisconsin legislators seek to impeach a new state Supreme Court Justice before she even sits for a case; and in Washington, Justice Alito is asked to recuse himself because of an interview he gave. Meanwhile, Section 3 is addressed by a former US Attorney General, who says it is inapplicable to the President for reasons that may seem counterintuitive, even strange. We analyze the claims as well as what lies behind them in our constitutional system. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.
Virtuous Presidents and A Loose Cannon - guest Vikram Amar
Resignation Realities and Bullets Dodged (Part 4)
Disgrace
Debate Debacle, and Agency Atrophy
The Court's Originalism About Face
Protests, Mifepristone, and Bump Stocks
Lear Jets, Books, and Virtue
The Jury Speaks
Big Mouth on Campus
Flags of Our Spouses
Trials, Pardons, and Elephants
Immunity versus The Rule of Law
Sense and Nonsense on Immunity
Don't Touch but Do Convict
Crime Means Punishment
Immunity Therapy
No Standing Any Time
History Will Judge
Dissenting in Concurrence
What the Concurrences Should Have Said
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free