Since the Federal Trade Commission began bringing data security enforcement actions in 2002, no court had ruled on the substantive merits of the FTC’s approach. A panel of three Eleventh Circuit judges decisively rejected the FTC’s use of broad, vague consent decrees, in the LabMD v Federal Trade Commission ruling that the Commission may only bar specific practices, and cannot require a company “to overhaul and replace its data-security program to meet an indeterminable standard of reasonableness.” We are joined by TechFreedom’s President Berin Szóka and Legal Fellow Graham Owens. They explain why this case is so crucial, what’s next for the FTC and what policy changes can be on the horizon.
#104: Legal Hacking
#103: A Network for the Future
#102: The FBI and Browser Spying
#101: Government and the Internet of Things
#100: Centenario
#99: Controlling the Price of Business Broadband
#98: Uber for Planes?
#97: Space Regulation
#96: Recharging Hotels
#95: Cybersecurity Myths
#94: Email Privacy in an Emergency
#93: Activism, or Slacktivism?
#92: Government Hacking
#91: Democrats Divide on Uber
#90: Media Ownership
#89: Arizona Tackles Airbnb, Home Sharing
#88: Regulating Fantasy Sports
#87: High School Surveillance Debate
#86: Supreme Court Decides in Spokeo
#85: Privacy in the Golden Age of Surveillance
Join Podbean Ads Marketplace and connect with engaged listeners.
Advertise Today
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Insight Story: Tech Trends Unpacked
Zero-Shot
Fast Forward by Tomorrow Unlocked: Tech past, tech future
Lex Fridman Podcast
Elliot in the Morning