046. Signaling your financial trustworthiness lowers your NGOs impact by half: George Mitchell and Thad Calabrese
Summary
Did you know....
When nonprofits signal they are financially trustworthy, they actually give up to half of their potential impact.
Why is this "financial trustworthiness signaling behavior” so pervasive, when it has this high a cost?
In this podcast episode, I interview George Mitchell, Professor of Nonprofit Management at Baruch College, City University of New York – and a long-time collaborator, including on our book (Between Power and Irrelevance: the Future of Transnational NGOs’ (Oxford University Press, 2020) -- and Thad Calabrese, Professor of Public and Nonprofit Management at New York University about their provocative new findings.
George’s Bio:
Thad’s Bio:
We discuss:
Nonprofits frequently adhere to four financial ‘orthodoxies’ or norms:
What if these practices, these financial norms, actually reduce your impact as a nonprofit by as much as 50% (in terms of your overall spending levels)?
George and Hans did a large-scale, quantitative study on US-based international and domestic nonprofits that indicated exactly this. Their research findings were picked up by several national US media, given their provocative nature.
Quotes:
“Norm-adhering nonprofits sacrifice about half of their mission impact over a 10-year period compared with norm-busting nonprofits.”
“Forgone mission impact is the hidden cost of trustworthiness”
Resources:
George’s LinkedIn Profile
Thad’s LinkedIn Profile
George's blog post – pointing to an article in The Conversation: HERE
Related article in Nonprofit Policy Forum (Open Access): HERE
Book: Between Power and Irrelevance: the Future of Transnational NGOs’ (Oxford University Press, 2020): HERE
Youtube video of this podcast
Click here to subscribe to be alerted when new podcast episodes come out or when Tosca produces other thought leadership pieces.
Twitter LinkedIn Facebook
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free