Episode 0201 - SCOTUS to Hear Case as to Whether 388 Elected Officials Violated thier Oath of Office!
Article I, Section 4, of the Constitution, says that the legislatures of the 50 states shall prescribe the time, place, and manner of elections for representatives and senators. The DNC went into the courts of several battleground states and unconstitutionally changed election laws in these states. All 388 of the respondents were aware of this action and did not do anything to stop it, nor did they attempt to prescribe a remedy that would make invalid, the electors of said states. This is likely a violation of their oath of office. It is not necessary to demonstrate treason, fraud, or any other positive violation of the law. The mere act of allowing it to happen is a violation of their oath of office and a matter of record. No proof is required to show negligence. My guess is that SCOTUS will restate the case along this line and rule accordingly. We are living in interesting times!!!!!
Supreme Court Considers Taking Brunson v. Adams Case That Seeks to Overturn 2020 Election
Supreme Court Considers Taking Brunson v. Adams Case That Seeks to Overturn 2020 Election (theepochtimes.com)
What would happen if that wishful thinking made it all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States? That may be just the case with Brunson v. Adams, et al. Mr. Brunson has petitioned the Supreme Court to hear his case against 388 federal officers, including President Biden, Vice President Harris, former Vice President Pence and 385 members of the U.S. House and Senate. Does his case have a constitutional leg to stand on, or is it just wishful thinking?
349 - Wishful Thinking Going to the Supreme Court (rumble.com)
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free