The epistemology of obvious and unobvious miracles
Can we be justified in believing that God is "behind" some event when we're not even sure that it was a miracle? What would that mean? Why are obvious miracles important epistemologically? Here is the testimony of Andrew Klavan that I refer to in the video: https://youtu.be/KgT43ppxpzY Thumbnail is a picture of baseball player Gary Carter from Wikipedia.
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free