In Lora v. United States, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the Section 924(c) prohibition on concurrent sentences applies to sentences arising out of different subsections. Justice Jackson, writing for a unanimous Court, writes that it does not, that crimes from other sections are not subject to the ban on concurrent sentences. Guest Host Jeff Barnum.
More Episodes
Gundy v US (delegation of power)
2019-06-20
2019-06-20
McDonagh v Smith (fabricated evidence)
2019-06-20
2019-06-20
Manhattan CAC v Halleck (1a)
2019-06-17
2019-06-17
VA Uranium v Warren (NRC/AEA)
2019-06-17
2019-06-17
Gamble v US (sep sovereigns doctrine)
2019-06-17
2019-06-17
Va House v Bethune-Hill (Standing)
2019-06-17
2019-06-17
Quarles v US (Burglaries & the ACA)
2019-06-12
2019-06-12
Parker Drilling v Newton
2019-06-10
2019-06-10
Azar v Allina health (Medicare “fraction”)
2019-06-04
2019-06-04
Ft Bend, TX v Davis (EEOC)
2019-06-04
2019-06-04
Mont v US (supervised release tolling)
2019-06-03
2019-06-03
Smith v Berryhill (SSA Appeals)
2019-05-31
2019-05-31
Nieves v Bartlett (Retaliatory arrest)
2019-05-28
2019-05-28
Get this podcast on your
phone, FREE
