In Pugin v. Garland, the Court reviewed "whether an offense 'relat[es] to obstruction of justice' under §1101(a)(43)(S) even if the offense does not require that an investigation or proceeding be pending. Dictionary definitions, federal laws, state laws, and the Model Penal Code show that the answer is yes: An offense “relat[es] to obstruction of justice” even if the offense does not require that an investigation or proceeding be pending." Jake Leahy, Host.
More Episodes
Nutraceutical corp v Lambert (23b Tolling)
2019-02-26
2019-02-26
Yovino v Rizo (Dead judges voting)
2019-02-25
2019-02-25
Helsinn v Teva (Patents “on sale”)
2019-01-22
2019-01-22
New Prime v Oliveira (Arbitration)
2019-01-15
2019-01-15
Stokeling v US (ACCA Robbery)
2019-01-15
2019-01-15
Culbertson v Berryhill
2019-01-10
2019-01-10
Schein v Archer & White
2019-01-10
2019-01-10
Shoop v Hill
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
Escondido v Emmons
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
US v Stitt
2018-12-10
2018-12-10
Weyerhaeuser v USFWS
2018-11-27
2018-11-27
Mt Lemon v Guido (ADEA)
2018-11-06
2018-11-06
Pavan v Smith (2016 opinion)
2018-08-29
2018-08-29
Get this podcast on your
phone, FREE
