Mastering the Bar Exam: Torts (Episode 6) Strict Liability

In this episode, we'll turn our attention to defenses in Tort Law, examining the strategies and arguments that can be used to counter tort claims.

Picture a scenario where a property or homeowner owner is being sued for negligence after a guest tripped on a slightly uneven floorboard. The property owner might employ a defense to counter the claim, arguing that they took reasonable care to maintain the property.

An illustrative case that exemplifies the use of defenses in Tort Law is "Assumption of Risk." In this case, a participant in an extreme sports event signed a waiver acknowledging the risks involved. The court had to determine if the participant assumed the risks associated with the activity, which could serve as a defense against a potential negligence claim.

One notable case that highlights the importance of defenses in Tort Law is "Brown v. Smith." In this case, a defendant argued that the plaintiff's own negligence contributed significantly to the accident, presenting a comparative negligence defense.

Let's engage in an interactive exercise to further understand these defenses. Consider a scenario where a doctor is being sued for medical malpractice after a surgery didn't go as planned. What defense might the doctor use, and how would it apply?

Now let's look at the model answer. The doctor may use the defense of "Standard of Care." They would argue that they followed the established medical standards and procedures during the surgery, and the unfortunate outcome was a known risk associated with the procedure.

To further enhance your understanding, let's engage in an interactive exercise. Consider a situation where a manufacturer is sued for a defective product, but they argue that the plaintiff misused the product, leading to the injury. Discuss the defense strategy and its elements.

Now let's look at the model answer. The defense strategy involved in this scenario is "Product Misuse." The elements typically include demonstrating that the plaintiff used the product in a way that it was not intended or reasonably foreseeable, and this misuse was a substantial factor in causing the injury.

Defenses in Tort Law play a crucial role in safeguarding individuals and entities from undue liability.

Imagine a scenario where a homeowner is being sued for a slip and fall accident that occurred during a party they were hosting. The homeowner might invoke the defense of "Open and Obvious Danger," asserting that the hazard that caused the accident was clear and apparent, and the guest should have taken precautions.

Let's imagine a situation where a property owner is sued for premises liability, but they claim that the injured party was trespassing at the time of the accident. Discuss the defense strategy and its elements.

Now let's look at the model answer.

The defense strategy in this scenario is "Trespasser Liability." The elements often include establishing that the injured party was indeed trespassing on the property, and the property owner did not owe the same duty of care as they would to a lawful visitor.

Another noteworthy case involving the defense of "Good Samaritan Law" centers around a person who attempted to provide medical assistance at an accident scene. The court had to determine if the person was protected from liability under the law for their efforts to help.

Now, for your final exercise in this episode, let's consider a scenario where a manufacturer is being sued for a product defect that led to injuries. What defense might the manufacturer use, and how would it apply?

Now let's look at the model answer.

The manufacturer may use the defense of "Product Misuse." They would argue that the product was used in a way that was not intended or recommended, which led to the injuries. This misuse could absolve the manufacturer of liability.

--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support