- EU's DSA enforces platform responsibilities
- AI Act pioneers risk-based AI governance
- Legislation intertwines, addressing AI in platforms
- Generative AI challenges DSA's regulatory scope
- Common systemic risk regulation in DSA, AI Act
How was this episode?
Overall
Good
Average
Bad
Engaging
Good
Average
Bad
Accurate
Good
Average
Bad
Tone
Good
Average
Bad
TranscriptIn a transformative era of governance, the European Union has embarked on a regulatory odyssey, charting a course through the digital cosmos where data sovereignty and artificial intelligence converge. As the digital domain burgeons with advancements, so too does the need for comprehensive oversight. The Digital Services Act (DSA) and the AI Act emerge as the EU's dual stars guiding this journey, promising to reshape the digital landscape and fortify the ramparts safeguarding fundamental rights.
The DSA, a legislative evolution from its progenitor, the eCommerce Directive, introduces sweeping responsibilities for online platforms and bestows new rights upon users. It encompasses a breadth of areas including intermediary and platform regulation, liability, transparency, appeal and redress mechanisms, regulatory bodies, systemic risk assessment, data protection, and the intricacies of online advertising. The enforcement of the DSA is now in full swing, with its most stringent requirements befalling the shoulders of very large online platforms (VLOPs) and search engines (VLOSEs), tasked with navigating a complex web of specific obligations.
In tandem with the DSA's enforcement, other legislative pieces such as the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) and the regulation on transparency and targeting of political advertising (PolAd) are set to influence platform activities, especially those related to content moderation policies.
While the DSA regulates intermediary services, including online platforms, the AI Act, recently given the final nod by the Council, pioneers a risk-based approach to AI governance—one that is the first of its kind globally. The AI Act delineates clear mandates for developers and deployers of AI, marking a significant step in addressing the nuanced challenges posed by AI technologies.
Despite being legislated in parallel and ostensibly covering distinct realms of technology regulation, the DSA and AI Act are increasingly interwoven. This is especially true as AI systems become more embedded in the services that platforms provide, blurring the boundaries between these two regulatory frameworks. The AI Act's preamble acknowledges this entanglement, suggesting that a comprehensive understanding of the legal regime at this intersection may require reconciling divergent stipulations from both pieces of legislation.
The rise of generative AI, capable of crafting content in response to user prompts, presents a unique challenge, as it does not neatly fit within the DSA’s categories of intermediary services. Google’s AI Overviews, for instance, exemplifies how AI is transforming traditional search services by generating direct answers rather than providing a list of links, raising both expectations and concerns about the implications for content dissemination and moderation.
The DSA and AI Act share common ground in the realm of systemic risk regulation. The DSA imposes an obligation on VLOPs and VLOSEs to assess and mitigate systemic risks, a requirement echoed in the AI Act for providers of general-purpose AI models. Both laws aim to safeguard against potential negative impacts on public health, safety, public security, fundamental rights, and society at large. The overlap raises critical questions about freedom of expression, with the European Commission wielding enforcement powers that have already sparked debate about the potential for overreach.
As Europe forges ahead with the DSA and AI Act, it stands at the vanguard of digital governance, holding the beacon high for others to follow. It is a testament to the EU's commitment to addressing the complex challenges at the nexus of platform economies and AI technologies. The success of these regulations hinges on their ability to harmonize the protection of fundamental rights with the dynamic and ever-evolving digital ecosystem.
Get your podcast on AnyTopic