Inquiring minds want to know! Apparently this individual asked him questions that the White House had given her, well four out of eight! I thought that all American Media did this, giving people questions before the interview because American journalism is such crap! Everybody call the justice department 202-514-2000 demands they break up the corporate media Monopoly because only four corporations own all the media! That's why it's all fake news and that's why American opinion is so polarized they divide and conquer us! Worked for the Romans and that's pretty much what we got today the vestiges of the Roman empire
Everybody knows that the quality of journalism in this country has sharply declined over the past years. Four corporations on all the media! So that's a big reason why we can't seem to get any real news in this country, and as a result, people's views are so divided. That's the way the powers that be want us - divided and conquered.
But it is of great concern that the New York Times, supposedly one of the best newspapers in the world, has never called for DIAPERDONALD to drop out of the race! Why didn't you call for the GOP to drop him as a candidate and for him to drop out when he was convicted as a rapist? Or when he was convicted for cooking the books in order to interfere with our elections?
I agree that Biden should drop out of the race too, both candidates should drop out of the race, both candidates are unfit! One is a war criminal and the other is a traitor of epic proportions.
Please stop propping up the traitor of epic proportions, New York Times! We need you to be fair and balanced right now please call for both to drop out so we can reopen nominations and get ourselves a real president for a change.
IN THE CONSOLIDATED JUSTICE COURT OF ARIZONA IN TUCSON
STATE OF ARIZONA (LAURA CONOVER)
Plaintiff,
v.
TRISTA TRAMPOSCH
Defendant.
CASE NO.: CR-23-013942-MI
MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON VIOLATION OF 180-DAY RULE AND DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS
INTRODUCTIONThe defendant, TRISTA TRAMPOSCH respectfully moves this Court to dismiss the charges of animal cruelty and resisting arrest. This motion is based on the violation of the 180-day rule for bringing the case to trial and numerous due process violations, including false arrest, evidence tampering, and the misuse of involuntary psychiatric evaluations to harass and silence the defendant. The defendant also requests the return of unlawfully seized animals and compensation for defamation and malicious prosecution.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On October 5, 2023, charges were brought against the defendant for animal cruelty and resisting arrest.Since the charges were filed, the prosecution has attempted to delay the proceedings by filing for involuntary psychiatric evaluations and Rule 11 on three occasions.The defendant was unlawfully detained and subjected to an involuntary psychiatric evaluation, which confirmed the defendant's mental competence and resulted in a clean bill of health.The defendant has been actively seeking to dismiss the charges based on false arrest, lack of probable cause, and evidence tampering by the prosecution.Despite these efforts, the prosecution has failed to bring the case to trial within the 180-day timeframe, as required by Arizona law.The defendant's animals were seized and treated cruelly while in police custody, as evidenced by video and witness testimony.The defendant is a political candidate, and this prosecution has caused defamation and harm to the defendant's reputation, potentially as part of a malicious intent to prevent the defendant from running for public office.LEGAL STANDARDArizona's speedy trial rule mandates that a defendant must be brought to trial within 180 days from the date of arraignment. This rule is designed to protect the defendant's right to a fair and speedy trial, as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and corresponding provisions of the Arizona Constitution.ARGUMENTSViolatio
view more