Why Life Couldn’t Have Evolved From Non-Living Chemicals

Atheists must believe that living creatures evolved from non-living chemicals, via a process commonly called chemical evolution (aka abiogenesis). But real scientific laws, especially of chemistry and information theory, refute this. Chemical processes go in the opposite direction required.

For example, life needs exclusively ‘one=handed’ molecules, while random chemistry produces an equal mix of left and right handed molecules. Also, little molecules in water don’t combine to form the needed big molecules; rather any big molecules break down to little molecules.

Yet another problem is the wrong kinds of reactions, which chemical evolutionists avoid by buying pure reactants. Chemical evolutionists also can’t explain the encyclopedic information content needed for enzymes, DNA, and molecular machines essential for life.

Join physical chemist Dr Jonathan Sarfati for a discussion of the building blocks of life, and how everything we know about chemistry argues against the imagined chemical start to evolution.

✍️ Links and Show Notes

• Could chemical evolution produce DNA?
• Was life really created in a test tube? And does it disprove biblical creation?
• 15 loopholes in the evolutionary theory of the origin of life: Summary
• The Miller–Urey experiment revisited

📚 Helpful Resources

• By Design: Evidence for Nature’s Intelligent Designer
• Chemicals to Living Cell: Fantasy or Science?
• Busting Myths: 30 Ph.D. Scientists Who Believe the Bible and Its Account of Origins

💙 Social Media

► Facebook
► TikTok
► Instagram
► X / Twitter
► eNewsletter

📅 Events

We present at hundreds of events around the world each year. To see what events are happening near you, or to request a creation presentation in your Church (or other gathering).

Thanks for watching!