In the continuation of our series on responding to King James Onlyism, Will addresses the differences between the 1611 KJV and the 1769 KJV. KJVO proponents will often say that the 1611 and 1769 are identical except for some minor font changes and typo corrections which don't affect the content at all. Will shows in this episode how reductive that statement is. KJVO advocates are left with the burden of proof not not only how the KJV is perfect, but which specific revision of it is perfect. The KJVO position gives up the entirety of textual criticism which in turn gives up such a powerful proof of the preservation of God's word.
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free