S2 | SS46: Good Guys With Guns

Today, we’re talking about arguing. Specifically, arguing in bad faith. We’ve done it; you’ve done it; and politicians, pundits, and public figures do it all the time. Accusations fly, especially during times of crisis (like after gun massacres) or in election years. But no one ever takes the time to explain what they mean when they accuse someone of arguing in bad faith.  I mean, how are you supposed to recognize these outrageous fallacies if no one will tell you how they work?! 

Knowledge is power, people. And we’re here to make you really damn powerful.  In this episode, we’re going to talk about what, exactly, good faith and bad faith arguments are and why debating in bad faith is so harmful to actual progress. Then, we’ll work through some examples of the bad faith arguments that make the rounds after every new spate of mass shootings. We’ll talk about why they fit the category, and even outline some good faith talking points on both sides that you can use to have these hard conversations with those who might disagree with you. 

What’s in this episode?

• Good Faith vs Bad Faith Arguments.

• Why debating in bad faith is harmful to actual progress

• Examples of bad faith arguments about gun safety/violence/control/laws

If you’d like to get in touch…

You can leave us a review at: https://ratethispodcast.com/fireside

Or you can drop us a note from our Contact page!

You can find all of our sources in our Show Notes.

And, if you’d like to help us reach our goal of hiring a professional editor, you can check out our Patreon Page! Patrons get priority topic requests, behind the scenes content, and more!