The Week According To . . . David Vance

How’s the craic?
It's another Irish night at Hearts of Oak as David Vance joins us afresh to give us his honest and often scathing appraisals on the talking points, from the news and his social media this past week.
Under the microscope this episode.....
- The Invasion: Illegal channel migration expanding.
- Tribunal due to rule on Shamima Begum’s citizenship case.
- Florida issues new guidance to doctors telling them to warn patients they could suffer a heart attack after taking experimental Covid jab.
- Better late than never: Past COVID infection 'as good as vaccines' at preventing severe illness.
- Brexit: The betrayal of Northern Ireland beckons?
- Trump statement on Sturgeon's resignation in Scotland.
- Those prosecuted for silently praying outside an abortion clinic are cleared after arrest by police sparked fury.
- Lolz. ‘Chinese spy balloon’ shot down over Alaska last week may have belonged to US amateur ballooning group.
- Net Zero Bollocks: Log burner rule change in England could land users with £300 fines.
- LGBT-BS 24/7: Trans NHS
- Food inflation skyrockets in the UK.

Pureblood David Vance will not submit, and he will not comply.
He used to be disgusted but now he tries to be amused!
In the battle for truth and liberty, David chooses the front line, he has been writing and talking politics for a long time and is a published author, political commentator and podcaster extraordinaire!
If the Covid 19 plandemic taught him one lesson it is that critical reasoning and a healthy contempt for the mainstream media are desirable armoury in the fight against tyranny.

Follow and support David on the following links.
Website: https://davidvance.net/
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/davidvance
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DVATW?s=20&t=vaRYl6wCZ4_ZLJ9DB0xpXQ
TikTok: http://tiktok.com/@thedavidvance
Locals: https://thedavidvance.locals.com/
BrandNewTube: https://brandnewtube.com/@TheDavidVanceChannel
Podcast: https://vancedavidatw.podbean.com/

Originally broadcast as a live news review 18.2.23

*Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast.

Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on GETTR https://gettr.com/user/BoschFawstin

To sign up for our weekly email, find our social media, podcasts, video and livestream platforms...
https://heartsofoak.org/connect/

Please like, subscribe and share!

Links to stories and articles in this episode.....
Immigration
VIDEO https://twitter.com/DVATW/status/1626855689162293248
Begum citizenship
https://www.greatyarmouthmercury.co.uk/news/national/23329140.tribunal-rule-shamima-begums-citizenship-case-next-week/
Florida
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11760449/Florida-tells-doctors-warn-patients-suffer-HEART-ATTACK-Covid-shot.html
COVID
https://news.sky.com/story/past-covid-infection-as-good-as-vaccines-at-preventing-severe-illness-12812415
Northern Ireland
https://twitter.com/DVATW/status/1626295465275797506?s=20
Trump’s statement
https://twitter.com/DVATW/status/1625982414563549185?s=20
Silently praying
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11758387/Catholic-woman-prosecuted-silently-praying-outside-abortion-clinic-CLEARED.html
Spy balloon
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/21429410/chinese-spy-balloon-shot-alaska-us-amateur-ballooning-group/?utm_source=sharebar_app&utm_medium=sharebar_app&utm_campaign=sharebar_app_article
Net Zero
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-64261624
Trans NHS
https://twitter.com/DVATW/status/1626692265698553858?s=20
Inflation
https://twitter.com/DVATW/status/1626650756399960074?s=20

[0:22] Thank you for joining us. David Vance, thank you for coming on this evening to share your wisdom.

[0:27] My pleasure. And don't forget, you're also streaming on Twitter as well.

[0:33] We're on my Twitter and your Twitter, our Twitter. Two Twitters become one.
[0:42] The wonders of technology. We'll pull in comments as they appear on the side. And as always, lots happening. I don't know if we will get through the stories. David, I noticed you had a
[0:59] great guest. I'm sure all your guests are great. But Christina Bobb you had on recently. Do you want to just mention that just to give people a flavour of what they may have missed?

Well, very, very simple. It's kind of ironic. A lovely guest, a really good person. Christina, as you know, is an attorney to the Donald Trump 2024 campaign. She was involved back in 2020 as well. She'd written a book, Peter, about essentially the shenanigans concerning 2020 and the lessons to be drawn from that so that 2024 isn't a repeat of 2020. So we had a great conversation. She made a lot of good points. I mean, she's very much on the, ball and then I got an email the next day from our good friends at YouTube saying you're not allowed to discuss the 2020 election. How dare you? We're taking this video off our site and, and we're giving you a seven day strike.
Take that Christina Bobb, take that David Vance, take that Donald Trump. This is the cancer that is
[2:01] Google slash YouTube. So yeah, what can you say, Peter? You're having a civilized conversation.
Christina is a very, I mean, she's an attorney, so she knows how to speak in non-inflammatory terms and kind of fact-based questioning, but that's not allowed, which tells me that the scandal of 2020, Is so great that over in YouTube and Google, they're just not prepared to countenance, you know, so
[2:29] maybe with our friend, Wachiki, having left the building, maybe Google, I don't know if it's, going to write itself or not, but anyway, Trump won.

 

Exactly. Yeah, you should know better, David, than streaming it. Come on.

 

I'm reckless. Well, the thing is, Facebook, I streamed it there, It was fine. But YouTube, oh no, you can't do that one. So yeah, I think I'll be very
[2:57] selective what I bothered streaming. In fact, actually, Peter, I might not even stream. I might, just do shorts over in YouTube because it's such a, it's such a censorious assess, but there's not a good content on it. Don't get me wrong. But for people like me that want to get out more, that's challenging stuff. But it's the first strike I've had in quite a while. So there you go.

[3:23] Well let's jump into some of the stories and let's have a look at immigration and let's see if I can play this. My producer is away at the moment so it'll just be me. Let me see if I can pull this up.

[3:39] For the people smugglers, increased police activity around Dunkirk and Calais has made, their regular launch points more difficult to operate from. French authorities are also busy erecting miles of extra security fencing around those beaches and that's driving the small boats further south. For years the criminal gangs have predominantly used the shortest route, to the UK, pushing off first from the beaches around Calais, then expanding to include areas near Dunkirk. While occasional boats have been launched farther south, in the past six months this route using beaches near Boulogne has seen a significant spike in activity.
And for maritime...

David, well, this is obviously immigration. This was GB News covering it, talking about the difficulties of these poor individuals not being able to go the shortest route. And we've been really selfish in telling them they have to go slightly further. But yeah, you'd posted at this. Tell us your, your thoughts. Because GP news is really the only one that highlight this issue.

[4:49] Yeah, it's only a matter of time to off come declare that any conversation on this is off limits, Peter. But yeah, I mean, it's seen that and the thing that struck me is number one, oh, how awful that they're being forced around the French coast a bit. I mean, the right place to, push them would be right round and down to Spain so that they then have to head back across the Mediterranean to Northern African shores where many of them come from. But yeah, I mean, the way the way the media would have you believe, you know, the sheer inhumanity of it, why, don't we build a bridge so they, you know, or a slide so they can just slide across the English Channel. It's all farcical anyway. I couldn't care less where their, you know, their start-off point is. It should never, ever end with them landing on British shores is what I think. I think our obligation is to stop every boat from wherever it comes, with these criminal gangs, Peter, driving it, and then these, frankly, criminals who are on it.
[5:53] Because if you partake in a criminal act, I'm afraid that makes you a criminal.
It doesn't have any other walk of life, but apparently not to these poor, disadvantaged, vulnerable men of military age coming across the channel in the dinghies.
So yeah, it's interesting what's happening. Also by the way, in that video, did you see the fence that the French are putting up?
.It's a bit two foot tall. I mean, you could step over it. That's stopping nobody unless they are very vertically challenged. So most people are going right over that fence or right through that fence. And this is what we're paying millions and millions to the French. Better pay the French nothing, have a strong naval presence that actually stops the boats and stops them coming here.
Because once they get here, it's all over for us. you know it's straight to hotels in Knowsley or wherever else they can be found.

But David, I thought the short fences were really quite racist because they're claiming that anyone who's a foreigner is very short and us Brits are very tall.

[6:57] That's right. Yes. It's more racism. I'm glad you can see the racism here because it's important, we keep our eyes spotted for this. Yeah. It's kind of like it's such a shell operation from the French.
I mean, they're doing the bare minimum. And I mean, ultimately, whether it's, you know, whether it's Calais or whether it's a bit further along, what does it matter? If they come here, they're in, so we have to stop them coming here. And of course, this is a serious point, as you know, and I'm sure those watching this understand, there's absolutely no desire on, the part of British political class to stop any of them. I mean, I've seen Nigel Farage talk about this and he's right about this. There's just no desire. They don't want to know. And as you also know, the only way we can really stop it anyway is if we leave the ECHR, if we invoke our own sovereignty, and as I say, if we actually do something, but we're too scared, to do it. Our politicians are too scared to do it. So yeah, it's going to be a slightly more southern sort of starting point for them, but the finishing point is always the same, the UK.

Yeah.
[8:05] Well, let's look on to actually not people coming here, but people leaving and then not being able to get back.
And if only they were all like Shamima Begum in that we would strip them off the right to stay.
But this is, I think, shocking to most people, tribunal to rule on Shamima Begum's citizenship case next week.
So she's in this legal battle with the government demanding, no, I know I'm a terrorist and I went off with ISIS but hey, I'm actually just a nice girl now, if they're right.
But it's such a waste of time and money, it's madness.

 

It is Peter, it's all of that and worse.
So I think there's a fair chance that Islamic bride Shamima Begum will be permitted back into the UK.
You've seen, I'm sure people may have seen over the past couple of weeks.
[8:58] Stories going out about her almost treating her like she's a model, a kind of a fashion icon.
[9:05] This is the same lady who did say that she felt that the Manchester Arena bombing, that terrible event that happened back in 2017 was justified. She said that.
Same lady who said, I mean, when you think of, I mean, I put a podcast out on this today, because I was contrasting.
So Shamima Beggum being treated by the parts of the media as a fashion icon is kind of shocking.
And yet she sympathized with the bomber, the Jihadi, who killed all those kids and their, moms and dads. So awful stuff.
And at the same time, and this is where I draw the contrast, and this is why, yes, I I do hate the British establishment.
Morrissey, the singer Morrissey, then releases an album or tries to release an album, the title track of which, is specifically about the rage he felt over the bombing at that Manchester Arena.
And well, what's happened to him? Well, it's not being released.
That's what's happened to him.
[10:11] So he's taken a view, which I think many people will feel, looking back at events like that, we shouldn't look back.
They say, don't look back in anger.
Morrissey says, we should look back in anger. And I say that as well.
But he's non-persona, he's cancelled.
Meanwhile, I reckon there's a fair chance that Shamima Begum will come back to the UK, and be hailed as some kind of new woman, strong, empowered woman coming back to bring much needed diversity, which no doubt she picked up in the Islamic State camps to the UK.
Oh, what joy.

[10:48] Diversity, that's what we're missing. Before I jump on to some of our COVID stories, let me just pull up some of the comments here.
I've got the Gettr tab open. So Tiger Boy 1985, first on Evening Peter and David.
Then Canadian Mom 1997, Evening Peter and David. Biotech Babe, Chris Davis 33, Melismac.
We have, I'm trying to, there are lots, yep, there are lots of you there.
So I'm scrolling, scrolling. Thank you for, few picture comments there.
Thank you for joining us.
And I hope we'll provide some entertainment for you as the evening progresses.
So let's stay on, let's jump on to COVID, from immigration to COVID.
And is this really quite an unusual story?
A story of course David that we thought should have been there right at the beginning, but anti-lockdown Florida, I don't know if the Daily Mail are saying that's good or bad, anyway, issues controversial new guidance to doctors telling them to warn patients they could suffer heart attack after COVID shot.
So the Florida Health have put out a release telling doctors to issue these warnings.
[12:07] It's quite an unusual story, quite an unusual thing happening now. What do you, this obviously caught your eye.

Well it did because I mean again the rank hypocrisy of the plagiarists in the Daily Mail.
[12:21] I use the word plagiarist advisedly because it plagiarized me during the week.
[12:26] So yeah, anti-lockdown Florida. Well, so is that pejorative? Can they not just say Florida? Do they have to put that in? There's the first point. The second point, it made me laugh this actually, you know, the issue of controversial new guidance. What's controversial about it? It's fact-based, no doubt about it, that we know empirically, no argument that the COVID jabs can cause
[12:51] cardiovascular events such as heart attacks. So we know that. So, you know, I don't understand where the Daily Mail is coming from that, you know, they could cause heart attacks. Of course, they do cause heart attacks. We know that. But maybe Peter, I like the broader picture is perhaps, beyond the remit of the awful Daily Mail, is that this dam that is breaking, I've been going on about this now, I think the last time we talked as well, I think more and more as the weeks go by, the months go by they can't hold back.
They just can't hold back the truth coming out about the jabs, about the adverse reactions, about all the horrors, the stuff that we were talking about, we were shouting about, back at the end of 2020 before they even started the jabs. We warned. And now, yeah, the Daily Mail, and I think this is, see, this is the function of organizations like the Daily Mail. They go ahead of the game a little bit to start maybe, you know, preparing people for the awful reality that, that the jabs do cause heart attacks and the jabs do everything but give you that which you were told.
So I thought it was an interesting headline. So maybe the Daily Mail is just softening people up for whenever we get more and more stories, more and more information and we can see exactly what has been going on for two years.
So I thought it was a significant headline, although I do dispute much of what the Daily Mail actually says.

[14:21] Oh yeah, let me just bring up one of the graphs they also included, which again, this shows the adverse reactions and they actually say this is a 1700% increase.
Now, it would be good if they had actually led with that instead of including that away at the beginning.
Because they've given the reason and yeah, you're right, they're seemingly attacking, the officials in Florida.
But yet they include the data that shows the reasons why.
Again, it doesn't make sense. The story, the headline doesn't really connect with the truth they give.

That's right.
Exactly, Peter. And all the way through this, we've argued from a position of facts and data, because, I think that's the only basis for argument really, because if it's just opinion, one, man's opinion is another man's poison.
But when you look at the data, like that chart you just put up, I mean...
You know, and there's more and more of this coming out. I mean, if you look at excess deaths.
[15:24] which we've all been talking about, it's unstoppable now. I think Germany, I put up a thing today, Germany sitting at 50 percent excess deaths. Do you know? And I mean, and I take, there's no pleasure at all in being proven right. But by the same token, there's no pleasure about, being ignored when you're trying to do the right thing and warn people. So yeah, I mean, you know, it looks, wow, it looks like something happened in 2021. In fact, actually, if you look at Germany, which is even worse, you can actually see the big spikes in excess deaths and all these events, coincide with the first jab, the second jab and the booster jab. It's clear as day. And, you know, know, I think that they're at the point now where they know this just absolute deluge of information is going to overwhelm the defences they have stuck up for the past couple of years. So at least Peter, we've been on the right side throughout this. And I just feel sorry for people who, you know, who went along, who believed the authorities. And we have to be careful not to be, you know, too sort of patronising to them. I feel bad for them, because a lot of them have woken up themselves and said, whoa, no more of this for us.
Mind you, if you're in Canada and you say that, you're not getting an organ transplant.

[16:44] I saw that, pure evil from Trudeau.
[16:48] So that was the Daily Mail wakening up, and this is Sky News wakening up.
Past COVID infection, as good as vaccines at preventing severe illness.
While the research suggests that natural immunity could be just as good as vaccines are preventing serious illness from COVID-19 infection, the study's authors encourage people to still get vaccinated to avoid any complications from the initial infection.
David, unpack this.

 

Yeah, well, you see, yeah, this is interesting, this one, Peter, because, what they're trying to say is that natural immunity is as good as anything that the vaccines give.
That's what they're trying to say. But at the same time, still encourage people to take the vaccines because sky like the BBC, like all mainstream media are 100% in the pocket of the government one way or another. So that's why they're saying that. But you see, I've got an issue with, I've always got issues with these things. I've got an issue with this because I dispute the fact that natural immunity is the important thing. That's what we all have.
[18:02] And it's a really good defence mechanism. But they're trying to suggest that, yeah, it's as good as anything the vaccines give you. No, it's much better because the vaccines don't give you any immunity. The vaccines weaken your immune system. They call all these adverse reactions we've just been chatting about. So even in a way, Peter, I can't accept this bit of it, where they're saying, oh, the two jabs isn't any better than having natural immunity.
It's way worse. It's way worse because natural immunity, what you've got, what I've got, which a lot of people watching this will have, it's not going to give us myocarditis or Bell's palsy or cripple us or give us infertility issues. None of those things from natural immunity. But, if you take an experimental mRNA jab, then there's a very good chance you might get potentially some of those things. So, you know, yeah, again, I think it's all softness up. So natural immunity.
I remember the conversations. Don't you, way back with Fauci and this one and the likes of Chris Whitty, when people did bring up the, you know, the whole thing about, well, you know, natural immunity is very strong and I remember them looking straight into the camera
[19:15] and lying and say, no, no, no, no, no, the vaccines, the super duper vaccines are much better.
They're, you know, and you look back in it now, and sometimes it's like we've lived through a complete nightmare. And we lived through it. And we were awake and throughout it, you know, and you look back at what they were those guys were saying, and now they're confounded by the very story you put up and that's sky running it, by the way, who were big shells for the jab.
So yeah, ultimately it's just interesting to watch this, isn't it?

They are big shills. The weird thing is that it talks about the studies, their 65 surveys, but they said it was partially funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

I thought that was a weird comment to include in the story.

[20:05] Yeah. Yeah. I wonder, is that Sky covering their backsides?
Uncle Bill phones them up and says, what's this? What are you trying to put out?
I don't know. It was strange.
But I mean, again, it's just ultimately as we both believe and many people watching believe, truth will out and the truth is emerging all the time.
And so, you know, all of a sudden, yeah, natural immunity. Oh, it's really quite good.
And these vaccines, well, maybe they're not what we told you they were. Maybe they're not.
And you give it six months and give it a year. And I just think this is just going to, you know, that's why they have to distract us, Peter.
That's why I think with these kind of stories breaking, that's why you've got UFOs over the United States.
That's where I, that's why I also think, you know, we have disappearing women near the riverbank in the United Kingdom. I think it's distraction politics.
Don't look there, look over there.
So they're losing, you know, Zelensky and Ukraine, they're absolutely losing to Russia.
So let's not talk about that. And then the COVID truth is emerging, let's not talk about that.
Well, no, let's do talk about that. And I'm not, you know, and forget their silly youthful stories, their silly spy balloons and also bizarre stories about missing women.

Right. They're not again the myths that just utterly bonkers that story and being the main story and it's random. It just, yeah.
[21:33] But anyway, we're enough down the rabbit hole, so let's continue.

Yeah, yeah, we can go a lot further than that.

We'll go there. Northern Ireland.
[21:46] That we are told that it's all going to come good here. GB News reporting Rishi Sunak is saying don't worry, that major announcement coming up.
But you don't really buy this. Your comment was the betrayal of Northern Ireland beckons.

Yeah, of course it does.
I don't believe any of that. No, no.
So this is obviously with regard to the Northern Ireland protocol and the fact that the DUP, won't go back into government until essentially the border of the Irish sea is removed. And, we have Sunak and the EU in cahoots with each other. And I think he came over here, Peter, on Friday, Sunak, for a flying visit. And I think that was to try, I mean, all the pro-EU parties seem really happy about it. They're real happy about it. DUP, I think, with good
[22:40] reason or asking a lot of sort of we'll have to wait to see all the details. I think what the, see my theory about all of this is that the British government and Boris Johnson, they left Northern Ireland in the single market and subject to the ECJ for a good reason and that was that by leaving, a part of the UK in those areas that that created friction. How do you solve that friction? Well, if the rest of the UK was to be closer linked to the single market and closer linked to the ECJ, then there wouldn't be a problem at all. And I do think that's the end game. I don't know, they're not going to get to it, but that's where they want to get this one. So I reckon I've been here before so often in matters Northern Ireland, they play this game, you know, will there be a deal? Won't there be a deal? Oh, it's one minute to midnight. Oh, you know, all this stuff, all it's all theatre, it's all sort of media hype. And they'll come out with something and they'll try and bounce the DUP in it if they can. And I would hope, and I've spoken to DUP friends and said to them, you know, I think you should stick to what you've said all along. Northern Ireland is a part of the United Kingdom. We shouldn't be treated any differently, no better, but no worse. We shouldn't have borders between us and the rest of our, you know, our fellow British citizens. And so if Sunak
[24:06] can't respect that, then we should with all due respect tell the Prime Minister to go and do one because we're not interested. And it looks like there is some Brexiteer resistance within the, Conservative Party still that is similarly inclined to that mindset. So in other words, you know, Prime Minister, treat this part of the UK like everywhere else. Don't try and do
[24:28] You know, sort of dodgy deals with the European Union. But yet I think he will try and do a dodgy deal with the European Union.

[24:36] Well, what are your thoughts, because obviously following Northern Ireland politics, being, Northern Irish, but watching it from afar over here in London, Jeffrey Donaldson seems to be someone who is invisible. I mean, Arlene Foster was always out there on the media. And my perception is the DUP are completely silent, that they may be very vocal in Northern Ireland, but actually the message doesn't seem to be getting out there. Is that a fair assessment?

[25:11] Well, they've got no media friends, you see, that's the problem. So if you take to the local media, the Northern Irish media, I mean, the only time the DUP has come on is to be beaten up.
I have sympathies for the DUP. Like for example, like last, I mean here's a small example of the, utter cynicism of the media and the politicians towards the DUP. So they tried to push through a law called Dáithí's Law last week, Dáithí's Law, named after a little six-year-old boy who needed organ transplant. And this law would basically, if it was enabled in Northern Ireland, mean that
[25:52] just like the rest of the UK, you would be automatically, the government would have first dabs to your body if you die. At the moment, we've got the much better position where we're naturally opted out, we have to opt in. So that's how it should be. Because there's no way the government should be able to claim that, which it does in England, Scotland and Wales. So that's a position. And what this law would do is bring us in line with the rest of the UK. And of course, it plays on the heartstrings, little boys, you know, they're going to die if they don't get the organ transplant. And the only way that can happen is if the DUP go back into the assembly, appoint a speaker and then enact the law. So to be fair to the DUP, they stood against that bit of emotional blackmail this week. So although Peter they're silent in media terms,
[26:46] there's a relative strength still there. And I think electorally, they don't fear an election, unlike the conservatives. So there's good reason for them, hopefully not to cave. But like all political parties, you know this from yourself, there's a spectrum of opinion within each party.
So there'll be some people in the DUP saying, well, maybe if it's not too bad a deal, we should go that way. But I think the fear of them then being seen to have compromised and sold out would mean that they'd be punished in the May council elections.
So I think the DUP will probably dismiss whatever it is Rishi Sunak and the European Union have, plans. But it does tell you plenty that Sunak's in league with the EU.
What more can I say?

 

You mentioned the story and I read that story and how it came across to me over here was that because an agreement has not been reached, obviously no one can get any transplants anymore, so the whole health system must have stopped. And that's how you get all these people dying because they can't get any transplants. So now you've explained, actually I completely understand.
[28:00] What the truth is, but it shows how the media spin it.

Well, it absolutely does. I mean, this is the same media that was spinning because of the energy hikes and the government brought out £600 payments to help alleviate.
People were saying, oh, unless the assemblies, Northern Ireland Stormont Assembly is put, back in place, no one's going to get anything. We got it all before anyone else in the UK.
This is why I'm a great advocate for not having government. I've learned that by not having a functioning government here, things get done better and faster and without the same sort of political grandstanding and all the rest of it. So my sincere hope is that the the assembly is not restored and we continue in Limbo.
It's great.

[28:44] Now one politician you do like, we all like and miss is this man here, Mr. Donald Trump.
This was a, I hadn't actually seen the statement until I saw it on your Twitter page and it, is beautiful.
Let me just read this is the statement on, I was going to say the death of Nicola Sturgeon, resignation of Nicola Sturgeon. And Trump says, good riddance to failed, woke, extremist, Nicola Sturgeon of Scotland. This crazed leftist symbol. Oh, it is absolutely beautiful. And this is what we are missing. Trump actually causing chaos in the White House.

It's superb. It was the best bet. The whole thing about her resignation. This was the best. But this is the language, this is what makes people love Trump, I think. It certainly makes us love Trump because he absolutely didn't hold back at all. And he mentions, I mean, he's aware of the gender recognition reform, but he's aware of all of that stuff.
I thought it was brilliant, Peter. Beautiful, as you say. Absolutely fantastic. And you compare that actually how Trump responded to her resignation to how Rishi Sunak responded saying, Oh, we would like to thank her for her service, blah, blah, blah.
[30:09] I thought, you know, there was Trump. I mean, the only thing is he did bring up his golf course.
I mean, he can't help these things, can he?
Leave your golf, leave your golf course out of it.
[30:19] I appreciate probably the SNP weren't helpful to him, but please.
There's a difference. But it was otherwise 100 percent brilliant.
And that's what we we missed. Those mean tweets. It's about time Donald Trump got himself onto Twitter, because if he's going to get elected, he needs that audience.

I agree. He needs to be everywhere as you and I are. So moving on to continuing the politics line, a piece of good news.
And I think last week when I had Lewis Brackpool on, I think we just touched on this, mentioned this because it had just come out, but it's all come out now.
And this is, you've interviewed her before David. Catholic woman prosecuted for silently praying outside abortion clinic is cleared after arrest by police sparked fury among supporters who condemned thought crime.
It's also very good news, but it doesn't really clear up what actually are people's rights or not.
But tell us about this because you've spoken to her, you've had Victoria or Isabel on.

 

Isabel, yeah, yeah.
I had Isabel on for a chat there. The thing is, the background is pretty obvious.
Was arrested for praying in the vicinity of an abortion clinic, silently.
[31:40] And the very fact that that can happen in the UK should cause everyone great concern, you know.
And when I spoke with Isabel, I mean, she knew that she was going to be taken to court this month, and they've dropped the case.
Because they obviously decided on the balance of evidence that they probably couldn't get her on it.
But I'm relieved about that because although having said that, as I did say to her at the time, When she was interviewed by the police and the policeman said to her, are you praying?
Do you remember that? And she said, I might be.
I might be. And on the basis of her saying, I might be, that's when the arrest was made.
Now that's probably illegitimate.
Had she said, yes, I was praying, then on the basis of the restriction order, because restriction order does actually say you're not allowed to do anything that could be perceived.
So listen, it's a good news story. Let's not take it. I'm so happy for Isabel. I'm sure it's a lot of relief from her. But these kind of orders that they are definitely experimenting with, and maybe this one, they didn't get this one away, but there'll be somebody else and it'll be someone, innocuous, someone like Isabel who's a really decent person, a prayerful person, someone who,
[33:04] you know, you couldn't fault the thing that she said. When I did the stream with her, I mean, the response from my viewers, Peter, was universally, this is such a courageous, brave, lady, but why is she being, why is she being, why was she arrested and why is she being prosecuted?
And a lot of people outside the UK can't believe that it could happen, but it did. And we need to make sure that, you know, things like this don't reoccur. But ultimately, I'm happy that it's a good result for Isabel. But I hope other people could do it. Like if someone wanted to go and do pray outside an abortion clinic tomorrow, what would happen? And I guess, you know, I don't know.
[33:43] It all points back to the politicization of her place and how the police operate in the country.
And I think that's a big problem still.

 

No, it is, it is. And of course all this happening under conservative government, as I do always like to point out, so much for that. And this is, again, this isn't a story about, pro-life or pro-choice, it's a story about freedom of speech and the right to stand on a corner and to pray. So it is about those fundamental freedoms and it's not necessarily about the whole abortion debate.

[34:17] It's really exactly, it's not about the abortion debate at all really. I mean if people want to have a silent prayer in the vicinity of, and we talked about this at the time, it's such an, incredibly stupid law. I can't believe that they conceived of this and that councils and whatnot are using it to create these situations around different places, you know. But yeah, it's just and saying, I mean, you mentioned the fact that it's happening under a conservative, government. No, it's not because this isn't a conservative government. These bunch of imposters in the conservative party, almost unilaterally, not maybe all of them, but almost unilaterally, are fake conservatives. I mean, they haven't conservative bone in their body.
They don't care about free speech. They don't care about all the things which I reckon that all the patriotic people who would have in times gone by, sort of, were the Conservative Party, believing. They don't care about any of those things. It's all about power, it's all about
[35:20] control, it's all about stamping down on free speech. And, you know, so, yeah, so they're not, I just wanted to correct you, they're not really conservatives, they're imposter conservatives.

Conservative in name only.

 

In name only. Cheetos, yeah. Cheetos Peter, yeah.

So let's go, you touched on the balloon UFOs, let's touch because there have been new revelations David.
And the new revelation is, according to The Sun, that the Chinese spy balloon shot over Alaska last week may have belonged to US amateur ballooning group.
I mean this just changes the whole story.

 

I know, it's clown world.
It's absolute clown world. I think with the release of the Epstein papers, which we've now seen all the details on, I, think having narratives like this, which did dominate the media, I mean, it was amazing.
And then here we go, Peter, as you say, you've got it up on the screen there.
It may have belonged to the US amateur ballooning group. So you know, what he sent up, what was it?
[36:24] I can't remember what the aircraft was.

 

It was an F-22 they sent up,
a very expensive trip, a very expensive trip actually.
To shoot down a 32-inch balloon.
So just a small balloon.

[36:40] Yeah, as I pointed out, the real balloon problem is in the White House.
It's not up in the 40,000 feet or whatever these balloons were.
But yeah, you had all this madness going on in the past week or so, and all these objects being shot down, as you say, at extreme expense.
And the White House even initially saying, well, we don't know about the balloons.
We don't know where these objects, where they come from.
ET phone home. And so they were almost going with the, it could be extra-terrestrial story.
And then because that was so ludicrous, then they started to back away from that.
And then it was China, China, China. But actually, Peter, what's interesting is back in 2017, 2018, the US was boasting about the fact that it was trialling,
[37:30] I don't understand this balloons. I mean, are we going back in time?
I mean, do you know what I mean? We got satellites. What do we want balloons for?
They were doing balloons as well. So, I mean, it doesn't surprise me that this could be a US balloon.
[37:46] I don't know why the Chinese would be wanting to use that kind of tech. But then other people have said, oh, the one that was shot down over the Atlantic, you know, when it got the one that was spotted over Montana by a farmer, how come Norad or how come no US intelligence services were able to tell us about it, but a farmer was able to spot it and make its way all across the, states before being shot down. Some people have said, well, it actually had anti-gravity.
I mean, what do you believe? It could go to Mach 5 and have anti-gravity. And I'm thinking, well, if it could do that, how come they shot it down? So I don't know. Look, anything coming out, of the white house, your best advice is just don't believe it.

[38:35] I mean, Mach 5, that would be what, three and a half thousand miles an hour. That's the fastest balloon. I don't know if balloons can travel three and a half thousand miles an hour.

[38:46] Yeah. I mean, I'll tell you that Phileas Fogg would be envious. He'd be around the world in 80 minutes, never mind 80 days if he was doing that kind of speed. But we still don't really know exactly what went on other than its distraction politics and that's honestly what I really think this whole story was about. It was so bizarre the media all jumped on it Peter as you know over here Rishi Sunak declared that oh yeah there's any of those balloons over the UK I'll not hesitate to send up the, well whatever we've got left of the RAF to shoot them down so I mean your guess is as good as mine what it actually was. But it definitely was a distraction.

[39:33] It was. If this was a 32 inch balloon, hobbyist balloon, then it was not the massive thing.
But I'll just give you a... So an F-22 being a plane buff, the F-22 Rapture, it actually is around $85,000 per hour to fly it. So that's all it costs. It's a very expensive trip to shut down a hobbyist balloon.
That's the first.
But I saw a CNN story and the CNN story was they had secretly got into China and secretly gone to somewhere 300 miles away from Beijing to a secret air base and it was making these, balloons and there were all these big...
This was a massive investigation by CNN.
What? Yeah, it doesn't add up.

 

Yeah, listen, that's why nobody watches CNN.
CNN is a stealth news channel.
It doesn't actually have any viewers.
It puts out this garbage, probably again to try and prop up the White House fantasy about this here.
[40:46] Honestly, I would have thought that China has the technology if it wants to spy.
I mean, look, for goodness sake, how many Americans have got TikTok on their phone?
If you want to spy, if that's your thing, and I'm sure the Chinese do it, but I'm sure the Americans do it too.
If they want to spy, you can do it through a mobile phone. You don't need to put balloons, but I do find the balloon just on the tech side of things.
So we're going back. I mean, what next? Pigeons, are we gonna have spy pigeons, that have little cameras attached to them and they've been trained to fly over US military bases, shoot down the pigeons, spot the pigeon, those of a certain age will remember that.
Wonderful cartoons, spot the pigeon. So yeah, it's all mad, it's insanity.
Again, that's the times in which we live.

 

Don't give Biden any ideas. He'll be releasing the pigeons.
[41:37] This is a story which actually is about two and a half weeks old, but you read posts and I think it's, I don't know if I covered it, so it's good to highlight what is happening. And there's a bit and I didn't realize. And this is log burner rule change in England, could land users with £300 fine. And actually you scroll down and it says that households in England, you're safe over there in Northern Ireland, you can emit your five grams of smoke per hour. But households in England could face fines up to £300 and even criminal records. So, a criminal record. So you've got all these illegal immigrants coming in, you've got all the grooming gangs, and yet the focus from the government is that you can't emit more than three grams of smoke per hour.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean, how much hot air does the government emit per hour? This is ridiculous.
English people have been burning wood, Peter, since time immemorial. I mean, and these wooden, these burners like that in the picture there that you've got above there in the story.
I mean, lots of people have got these. My sister has these in, one of these in her house. And
[42:59] people, if anything, were actually encouraged to get these. And now, as you say, you could end up, with a criminal record because you're burning logs in your home to keep warm. And of course, I wonder is this because they want to squeeze us in energy so you can't afford your gas if you're using gas or if you're using oil, you can't afford your oil. So what we're going to do is we're going to just corner off the wood. Don't think you'll go into the forest and forage wood and then use that no no no because we're going to be tracking your smoke emissions and if, they're above X amount as you say then that's a fine. We'll empower the local council to you know to have a never mind a traffic warden, a smoke warden, someone who will go around checking for you know tell-tale signs, coming from your chimney or whatever and yeah slap you with a fine and maybe you could end up with a criminal record because you want to stay warm?
[44:01] Are you kidding me?
But anyway, yeah, I thought that was, you know, it's another one of these ones, it's England, so it's not here for me.
But undoubtedly, you know, when these lunatics get these ideas, they spread out like 15 minute cities.
Same idea.

Yeah, there was another one on Net Zero and I didn't include although I meant to, which was a post you put up about the cost of breakfasts and talked about a cost of 22% and anyone who goes to buy butter or eggs or milk knows the crazy cost.
And I guess we're told that's how we're winning this war. how we're beating Russia by actually meaning we can no longer afford to buy food,
butter literally has doubled in the last year as of eggs.
And it just, again, I don't think it's us that are winning.
Talking to Callum on Thursday and he's just back from his Russia trip.
So it seems a Russia winning and not us.
Yeah, take that Putin. doubling our inflation, we're going to make it impossible to have, as you say, eggs and
[45:11] butter and milk and all these staple foods. And this is why you see that my argument in this as well is that the inflation figures that they play around with are so deceptive. Ordinary people know that
[45:26] If they go to, yeah, look, you go to the supermarket, you do your grocery shop, that's when you know what real inflation is.
And there you have Peter, you've put it up on the screen, I can see, you know, all these things.
Look at the double digit inflation way, way up, 20 plus percent and above.
And that's all inflicted on British families by the government's insane sanctions against Putin, which have had this kind of blowback. And we're paying it. And Callum's right. I just put out Russian exports have gone up. Russian imports have gone down. Their economy is much more balanced.
[46:11] Specifically Europe, Western Europe, it's committing economic hari-kari to, well, not really to teach Putin a lesson because Putin's happy, I would have thought he sees the state that we're all in. But I feel bad for people who, you know, on fixed income, say pensioners, who have to go to the supermarket. And you mentioned butter there. Like, where are they going to find all that extra money from? Not from their pensions. So where?
Well, they don't. So what they do is they scrape and save and they try and make do with less. And that's where my anger against the government comes from. I think of the people, disadvantaged people, the people on fixed incomes, the elderly people, and they live in the real world. You go to the supermarket, Peter, like you have to get your food. And at the same time, they're being hit by huge heating bills. And this is all to teach Putin a lesson. I mean, the only lesson is we should never have gone along with sanctions against Russia. Absolute stupidity but then there's a globalist agenda in place there as we all know.

[47:18] But we're all suffering, but of course I'm so glad that Rishi Sunak doesn't have to suffer because I'm sure he doesn't worry if bread's gone up from 80p to £1.50.
I'm sure it doesn't really take a dent in his budget.

Well if you're married to a billionairess, it probably is something you're going to be able to cope with, you know. But yeah, exactly. I mean, this shows you the detachment of
[47:41] a lot of the politicians from ordinary working families, or indeed retired families, either which way. It shows you that they cannot appreciate what must be going through many ordinary people's, household budgets. Like how the hell do we cope with this? How do I feed my kids? How do I do this, that and the other? Because as you showed there, Peter, those are real price increases. So whenever, the BBC tells us, oh, good news, the ONS said inflation is down to 10.1%. Do me a favour.
No, we're not buying that. That's another thing we're not buying. We know that on things that really matter to people like food, it's double digit all the way up 20, 30%. And that's not likely to go down anytime soon. Because remember, energy costs and food manufacturing is a big, element of the final bill. So that's why businesses reflect a lot of this in the end price. They have to or they go bust. And they're not being given the level of subsidy, by the way, that they need.
So I just think this will stay here for a good bit of, you know, maybe the rest of this year.

[48:48] Well, it's good that there wasn't a fixed income. Maybe pensioners will be helping the war by dying of hunger or will die by freezing. That all helps Rishi Sunak. Yeah. The rest of them.

It's very noble of them. Yeah. A sacrifice which Rishi wants them to do.

 

So, onto the NHS.
A friend of mine actually didn't, we talked and he was going to go and see the doctor and didn't go because of his concern that he would be forced to have a jab.
And if you're maybe older or less mobile, that is a concern.
But this is the other concern that you go and this thing appears in front of you.
Now that is some mug shot.
Oh, that is some mugshot. And this is John Harrell Trans NHS.
Just wanted to say how lovely all my colleagues have been in treating me just as one of the, girls. These people used to get help.

[49:47] They did and they still need help, but they're not getting it. Instead they're being indulged.
I mean, look at this. Just read the rest of that out for everyone there, Peter.

So in treating me just one of the girls in my new NHS post, interesting time with one young female patient who wanted to be treated by a female and I felt I need to explain I was a trans female. She's just said, that is fine. You're female. And he wanted a female nurse to treat me.

Yeah, things that never happened. Does anyone actually believe that? If I was in an NHS bed and something like that came towards me, honestly, I would be right out of that bed, out of that ward and away down the road. There's no way. But yeah, I mean, NHS trans nurse.
And by the way, she says to that, she's got a new NHS post. So this is our wonderful NHS in action, putting people who I would say have got some form of, at least I'll be polite, cognitive dissonance, to put it politely, or mental issues in some regards, it shouldn't be

[50:59] treating people, Peter. They should be being treated, I think. But hey, what can you say?
That's the NHS. It's good to know what the NHS priorities are, trans nurses. Well worth your taxes.

 

But David, it is good that you obviously commented if that...
thing came along then suddenly it feels much better. Actually it does help with the healing process.

It does, it picks it up. Honestly if I was a death door and I seen that angel of death coming towards me I would be gone. So as you say, maybe it's a miracle cure they're going to introduce one of those in every NHS ward and watch those bed occupancy rates go down through the floor as, As everyone legs it.

[51:45] David, let's just want to face off for the clip you put up. And the weird thing, this is this is the really weird thing.
[51:54] I was looking at this this afternoon and I thought, did I look at this because David tweeted it?
I know because you tweeted three hours ago.
So I was looking at it completely differently, having a little chuckle.
And that is a Monty Python sketch. Oh, yeah. I just thought I would play it as we finish because it is good to end on humour.
I'm a little bit confused why I was looking at that as you were as well separately.
[52:24] So let's just play this. I think there's a longer for this is just one minute.
I'll play this in 60 seconds. But I'll play this.
[52:36] Give me a moment.

[52:39] I want to be a woman. From now on, I want you all to call me Loretta.

What?
[52:46] It's my right as a man.

Well, why'd you want to be Loretta, Stan?
[52:53] I want to have babies.

You want to have babies?
It's every man's right to have babies if he wants them.
But you can't have babies.

Don't you oppress me.
I'm not oppressing you, Stan. You haven't got a womb.
[53:07] Where's the foetus going to gestate? You going to keep it in a box?
[53:14] Here, I've got an idea. Suppose you agree that he can't actually have babies, not having a womb, which is nobody's fault, not even the Romans.
[53:23] But that he can have the right to have babies.
[53:26] Good idea, Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies, brother.
Sister, sorry.

What's the point?
[53:34] What?

What's the point of fighting for his right to have babies when he can't have babies?
[53:41] It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression.

Symbolic of his struggle against reality.

Symbolic of his struggle against reality. Great line.

Yeah, yeah. We're not going to top that one, Peter. That is the first line.
[53:58] No. Yeah, but yeah, that came up on my TikTok, actually. That's where I saw that one.
Because I like comedy stuff too, you know.
And wasn't that prophetic though? the Pythons did that. So that's from obviously the life of Brian, which came out in 1981, or maybe 79.
79, yeah. Yeah, 79. And I remember going to see that movie way back then, you know, as a child.
And it was really, you know, it was really funny and people thought, well, you would never actually have conversations like that. And then 2023, you talked about the trans nurse, you know, and you realize that we are living in a post-Monty Python world whereby the surreal is now being made. We have to believe that it's real. But the payoff from John Cleese is excellent. It's symbolic of his struggle against reality.

 

Let me put just some comment at the end on GETTR, Tommy AU, you, Canadian mom 1997, Huckle3229 Hisalways Vicky and more. Thank you for tuning in David.
Thank you for joining us as always.

No, my absolute pleasure. I was having a good laugh. I do think Peter in times of darkness,
[55:19] and you know, pressures in all kinds of ways, it's healthy for us to all to laugh, to laugh at the oppressors, to laugh at the tyrants, to laugh at all of this madness. I think it keeps us sane. So I think this has been good for my mental health as well. So thank you for the opportunity and thanks for all the viewers. I recognise a lot of those names. Thank you folks for being here with, Peter as well. I make sure you support Peter by and also make sure you see me on Monday night in in my study at 8 p.m.
When we're gonna be talking actually, Peter, with a lovely lady that you and I both met three weeks ago, Charlotte.

 

Ah, Charlotte, yes.

 

Because in Countess of Burnley she...

[56:05] Baroness of Burnley.

 

Baroness of Burnley, yeah. Yeah, Charlotte's coming on for an hour of giggles on Monday night, so we'll keep the humour motif going I think for as long as we can.

 

She's good fun.
The viewers will enjoy it. So you can watch either, you can watch that live and then flick over to Hearts of Oak or vice versa, whichever you so wish.
So everything is there. But David, thanks for coming on. Thank you so much.

Thanks, Peter.

 

And thank you to all our viewers.
Or if you're downloading this listening on the go as a podcast on Podbean or any of the podcasting apps.
Thank you so much for listening. And we'll be back with you on Monday with John Waters looking at what's happening in Ireland with the immigration invasion, which one in four hotels are now booked up by immigrants.
So it's lovely hospitality has now gone out of control and destroying the country.
So tune in for that on Monday.

Do you know Peter, Peter, just popping in. I was down in Dublin myself just about a week ago.

And did you get a free hotel as well?

Well, I was going to say, I was trying, there's a couple of what I would call business hotels where people meet up for coffees and have a chat.
[57:22] They're all closed. They are closed and they're only open. They're, they're, they're for essentially, um, well, yeah, the, uh, the immigrants.
So it's amazing what's happening. So that should be a great chat with John on Monday night.
Look forward to that.

And then Charlotte with David also on Monday. So I wish you, our viewers, listeners, wonderful rest of your Saturday.
Good weekend. And we'll see you on Monday.