Terms of Service - SHAFT

I am an independent journalist. I recently heard the news about T-Mobile and their SHAFT clause which will take effect Jan 1 of 2024. Shaft stands for sex, hate, alcohol, firearms and tobacco. The accusation against T-Mobile is they will fine consumers $3500 for hate speech which is a direct violation of the 1st Ammendment. This is false. SHAFT was designed for election interference. Their response to their customers was “Hello all. These changes only apply to third-party messaging vendors that send commercial mass messaging campaigns for other businesses. The vendors will be fined if the content they are sending does not meet the standards in our code of conduct, which is in place to protect consumers from illegal or illicit content and aligns to federal and state laws.” 

Many customer pointed out that it’s for third party carriers sending spam throughout the networks. That’s what they want you to think. T-mobile has yet to release the terms of service it has quietly released stating it’s on a case by case basis so they may backtrack this policy because of all the backlash, however, although the policy doesn’t fine consumers, it will be used against consumers via blocking political candidates it considers part of SHAFT. 

According to a government candidate who ran for congress with the initials RWC “Who gets to determine what is and isn’t “hateful”? Will political text messages be censored now as well going into 2024? This is what [they] did to me in 2019/2020 when I ran for Congress. I warned people that it would happen to others when nobody did anything to stop this when it happened to me as a congressional candidate! Nice TOS date change! Just in time for the GOP primary and 2024 presidential election! Nothing to see here!”

This is the most likely scenario for the coming 2024 elections. Trump alone falls into the hate speech category and T-mobile could easily block all traffic through its networks and fine them for political purposes. A gross example of election interference keeping the candidate they want in the forefront. The news media is barely picking up this story and the ones that do are deflecting towards the consumers and not the most plausible answer. Election interference. T-mobile, if caught using their shaft terms to interfere with an election could lose their company altogether. The people, which is you. Yes, I am pointing to you who is watching this. You can stop this fascist attempt to interfere in our elections. You can share this message and tell your friends that no company should have such power to stop election ad traffic for their own candidate. And it’s not about Trump. My subscribers know I am not on his train at all nor am a fan of Biden, either. I care about fairness of elections and who wins fairly deserves our respect. But ever since the political world started pointing fingers back and forth every election in the name of cheating, we can all safely assume all parties have cheated and T-mobile isn’t doing us any favors in the name of democracy, even though constitutionally we are a republic.

T-mobile was just caught trying to swing an election using a sneaky policy to give them justification. That is the true story and don’t let the media throw you off by pointing towards the first amendment. Big corporations never get hurt doing things like this and you have the power to stop them. Boycott t-mobile and move carriers. Our money is what gives them the power. Set t-mobile as an example of what the consumer wallet can do. Put them out of business and show the next carrier that tries for election interference just how powerful we really are. Stop the politicians from interfering in fate. It’s not only unfair, it’s immoral, greedy and selfish. You don’t cheat when you vote do you? Then why should any traffic gateway do it? If a million people dropped t-mobile, we won. But don’t think they will stop at that. Power will never stop until its light is put out. Shame on t-mobile and anyone supporting their evil intentions.