A) Jesus concludes with the assurance that "the powers of Hell will not conquer." Some interpret this as the Church being indestructible. However, the context suggests that Hell cannot withstand the church's assault. The church, in Greek, is portrayed as being on the offensive, not defensive. If the church embraced this truth, as Jesus intended, it wouldn't remain silent and passive but would assertively impact the world, just as Jesus promised.
B) David devotes additional time to discuss Matthew 16:19. He presents three general interpretations of the concepts of binding and loosing, as well as locking and unlocking. In his explanation, he acknowledges the first interpretation, dismisses the second as being far beyond the boundaries of scripture, and aligns most closely with the third interpretation. His review is intriguing, but he emphasizes that the scripture is not about ‘whosoever’, but ‘whatsoever’. Furthermore, all authority is vested in Jesus, who alone has the right to act (Matthew 28:18-20). The church serves as an agent for the Lord, not vice versa.
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free