Society & Culture:Philosophy
In this episode, I revisit some of my earlier written work that laid the foundation for Homeopathic Facial Analysis (HFA) and reflect on how those ideas still hold strong today. We explore Hahnemann’s miasmatic theory, examining how his research into chronic disease shaped the evolution of homeopathic practice. By breaking down the key differences between acute and chronic diseases, we highlight Hahnemann’s realization that effective chronic care requires recognizing and addressing an underlying dominant miasm. We also discuss the limitations of the “layers” theory in chronic prescribing and how HFA evolved as a practical, reproducible system that embraces Hahnemann’s core insights while moving beyond outdated ideas. This episode introduces key concepts that will continue into the next discussion on miasms as universal forces.
- Hahnemann’s Early Success and Frustration with Chronic Disease: We discuss Hahnemann’s initial success with acute conditions and his later struggle to achieve the same results in chronic cases, leading to his research on miasms.
- The Development of Miasmatic Theory: We explore Hahnemann’s discovery of psora, syphilis, and sycosis as the three primary chronic miasms, emphasizing the central role of psora in chronic disease.
- The Problem with the “Layers” Theory: We discuss the limitations of the popular “layers” theory, which attempts to explain recurring symptoms through inherited disease layers, and explain why this model often fails in practice.
- The Evolution of HFA as a Practical Alternative: We highlight how HFA was developed by testing real-world clinical outcomes, adopting only methods that consistently improved results.
- Miasms as Forces of Motion: We introduce the idea that miasms are not diseases but energetic forces—outward, circular, or inward—that reflect the body’s natural defense mechanisms.
More Episodes
2025-01-22
92
Get this podcast on your
phone, FREE
