Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Is the American Dream in Decline?
Nate Silver on The Art of Risking Everything: Politics, Money, Power
Has The Electoral College Outlived Its Usefulness?
Will Kamala Harris or Donald Trump Be Better For America?
Should Israel Strike Iran?
Were Israel's Actions in the Gaza War Justified?
Election 2024: Are Identity Politics Holding Us Back?
Should We Legalize the Market for Human Organs?
Is the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Netanyahu Justified?
Wokeness in Public Schools: Helping or Hurting Students?
Does America Need a Third Party?
Does the Effective Altruism Movement Get Giving Right?
America the Dysfunctional with Brian Tyler Cohen
Can Israel Make Peace with Hamas?
Is the Two-State Solution Still Viable?
Mock Trial: Should Trump’s Conviction Stand?
Should Biden Step Aside?
History Lessons About Combatting Polarization in 2024 with Fareed Zakaria
Is Wokeness Killing Comedy?
Married or Single?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Mayo Clinic Talks
The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad
Positive Thinking Mind
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast