Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Mock Trial: Should Trump’s Conviction Stand?
Should Biden Step Aside?
History Lessons About Combatting Polarization in 2024 with Fareed Zakaria
Is Wokeness Killing Comedy?
Married or Single?
Is Islam Antisemitic?
MOCK TRIAL: Murthy v. Missouri - Free speech, Government and Misinformation on Social Media Platforms
Is It OK to Pay for Sex?
Is Taiwan Indefensible?
Young Voices Debate Tough Topics: DEI and Climate Change
The Pursuit of Happiness: Virtue or Pleasure?
MOCK TRIAL: Should the Courts Restrict Access to the Abortion Pill?
Should Elite Universities Reinstate the SAT?
Is Free Speech Threatened on Campus?
Ban the Box: Should We Banish the Criminal History Check Box from Job Applications?
Should Congress Stop Funding the War in Ukraine?
Is Religion a Force for Good?
Childhood Obesity Guidelines: Good Medicine or Too Extreme?
Should the US Ban Tik Tok?
Does Taylor Swift Deserve Her Billion Dollar Fortune?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
In the Great Khan’s Tent
Visualize Meditations
The No-Frills Teacher Podcast
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast