Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Is the Republican Party’s Refusal to Raise Taxes Fiscally Irresponsible?
Is Engineering Solar Radiation A Crazy Idea?
Is the American Dream in Decline?
David Petraeus and Andrew Roberts on Conflict, War, and Debate
Mock Trial: Is Trump Guilty in the January 6th Case?
David Brooks on the Art of Seeing and Hearing Others
Will the Future Be Abundant?
Should Congress Pass the Secure the Border Act?
Will AI Kill the Future of the Creative Arts?
How Would A No Labels Presidential Candidate Change the Outcome in 2024?
A primer for discussing Israel and Gaza and our divided American political landscape: John Donvan in discussion with author Mónica Guzmán
Do We Have Free Will?
Is Wokeness Killing Comedy?
Are DEI Mandates for University Faculties a Bad Idea?
Is Anti-Zionism the New Anti-Semitism?
Does Economic Growth Cost Too Much?
Should Artists Be Allowed to Borrow From Cultures Besides Their Own?
Should Ukraine Get Russia's Frozen Assets?
Is Modi's India Heading in the Right Direction?
Does America Need A Third Party?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Mayo Clinic Talks
The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad
Positive Thinking Mind
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast