The U.S. Supreme Court took up a case this week that could be the end of the road for a nearly 40-year precedent requiring judges to defer to federal agencies when interpreting statutes that are ambiguous – otherwise known as Chevron doctrine. On this week’s episode of The Term, we talk through how the issue landed at the court, and how far it might go in rethinking the precedent. Also this week, partisan politics were on full display at a Senate Judiciary committee hearing on whether Congress should mandate formal ethics rules for the justices.
S4 FINALE: United Or Divided? A Podcast Roundtable On The High Court
S4, E37: The Court Closes With LGBTQ Rights And Biden Debt Plan
S4, E36: The Supreme Court Guts Affirmative Action
S4, E35: The Court Delivers Its Immigration Blockbusters
S4, E34: A Victory For Native American Sovereignty
S4, E33: The Voting Rights Act Survives. What’s Next?
S4, E32: Union Strikes Out At High Court In Cement Case
S4, E31: Justices Dry Up Water Regulation
S4, E30: The Internet Survives The Supreme Court, For Now
S4, E29: Huzzah, Here Come The High Court Opinions
S4, E27: Justices Tackle Critical Trial Procedure Question
S4, E26: When Are Online Threats Protected Free Speech?
Special Episode: From Wolf Of Wall Street To First Street
S4, E25: Another Supreme Court Ethics Scandal?
S4, E24: Inside A Turbulent Supreme Court With Joan Biskupic
S4, E23: Could Immigration Law Target 'Abuelita'?
S4, E22: No. 1 Or No. 2? Justices Ask In Potty Humor Case
S4, E21: How Tom Goldstein Changed The Game
S4, E20: What We Learned, And Didn't, From The Student Debt Hearings
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Jim & Bill (It‘s Another Day)
HauntingLive
Dr. Paul’s Worldviews
The Ben Shapiro Show
Morning Wire