The U.S. Supreme Court took up a case this week that could be the end of the road for a nearly 40-year precedent requiring judges to defer to federal agencies when interpreting statutes that are ambiguous – otherwise known as Chevron doctrine. On this week’s episode of The Term, we talk through how the issue landed at the court, and how far it might go in rethinking the precedent. Also this week, partisan politics were on full display at a Senate Judiciary committee hearing on whether Congress should mandate formal ethics rules for the justices.
S1, E16: Kagan’s Twitter & Roberts’ ‘Golden Gavel’
S1, E15: Gorsuch Hates Nationwide Injunctions
S1, E14: The Larger Battle In A Montana Tax Case
S1, E13: With Trump Trial Looming, Roberts' Mind On Memes
S1, E12: Abortion, Bridgegate And The ACA
S1, E11: SPECIAL - Berkeley Law Dean On Conservative Takeover
S1, E10: The Government May Owe ACA Insurers Billions
S1, E9: Is This 2nd Amendment Case A Dud?
S1, E8: Kagan Knocks New Argument Format
S1, E7: Can DACA Survive The High Court?
S1, E6: Pollution Case Gets Testy, DACA On Deck
S1, E5: Polluting The Pacific & Traffic Stops
S1, E4: CFPB Under Review & Plurality Problems
S1, E3: Puerto Rican Debt Crisis & The DC Sniper
S1, E2: Gorsuch Surprises On Title VII
S1, E1: Justices Return To Historic Cases
Introducing The Term, Law360's Supreme Court Podcast
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Jim & Bill (It‘s Another Day)
HauntingLive
Dr. Paul’s Worldviews
The Ben Shapiro Show
Morning Wire