Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
#153 - Is Social Media Good for Democracy?
#126 - Should the U.S. Give Undocumented Immigrants a Path to Citizenship?
#134 - Is Universal Basic Income the Safety Net of the Future?
#167 - Should Scientists Dim the Sun?
#166 - All Hail the Driverless Car?
#165 - Should the Republican Party Re-Nominate Trump?
IQ2 Interview: Should You Love Your Enemies?
#164 - Can Constitutional Free Speech Principles Save Social Media Companies From Themselves?
#163 - Unresolved: The Techonomic Cold War With China
Special Release: Can AI Change Your Mind?
#161 - Should We Bring Extinct Creatures Back To Life?
#160 - Ten Years After the Global Financial Crisis, Is the System Safer?
Season Preview: New Year, New Debates
#83 - Should We Avoid Eating Anything With A Face?
#105 - Is Smart Technology Making Us Dumb?
#159 - Has Silicon Valley Lost Its Soul?
An IQ2US Thanksgiving Tradition
#158 - Is Trump Bad for Comedy?
#157 - Will Progressive Populism Save The Democratic Party?
#156 - Will Retail Alliances Fix the U.S. Health Care System?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
In the Great Khan’s Tent
Visualize Meditations
The No-Frills Teacher Podcast
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast