Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
A Summer Challenge: Radical Rethinking
The State of Debate on Capitol Hill: The American Health Care Act
#138 - Your Private Data: Can Tech Companies Keep it from the Law?
#137 - Will Video Games Make Us Smarter?
#136 - Unresolved: Trump's First 100 Days
#135 - Has Walmart Been Good For America?
#134 - Is Universal Basic Income the Safety Net of the Future?
#133 - Are Charter Schools Overrated?
#132 - Has the U.S.-Saudi "Special Relationship" Outlived its Usefulness?
#131 - Should We Give Trump a Chance?
#130 - Is Policing Racially Biased?
#129 - Should States Call a Convention to Amend the Constitution?
#128 - Is Obama's Foreign Policy a Failure?
#127 - Has Gerrymandering Destroyed the Political Center?
#126 - Should We Give Undocumented Immigrants a Path to Citizenship?
#125 - Is "Big Pharma" to Blame for Rising Health Care Costs?
#124 - Are the Elites to Blame for the Trump Phenomenon?
#123 - Climate Change: Has the EPA Gone Overboard?
Bonus Podcast: The GOP Must Seize The Center Or Die
Bonus Podcast: The Supreme Court Considers Racial Preferences In State University Admissions
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
In the Great Khan’s Tent
Visualize Meditations
The No-Frills Teacher Podcast
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast