Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
#91 - Is Death Final?
#90 - Do Millennials Stand A Chance?
The Controversy Over Ayaan Hirsi Ali At Brandeis University
#89 - More Clicks, Fewer Bricks: Is The Lecture Hall Obsolete?
Does Affirmative Action On Campus Do More Harm Than Good?
#88 - Is Russia A Marginal Power?
Does The President Have Constitutional Power To Target And Kill U.S. Citizens Abroad?
Was Snowden Justified?
Is Obamacare Beyond Rescue?
Reconsidering The Minimum Wage
Don't Eat Anything With A Face
Does Spying Keep Us Safe?
Has The Constitutional Right To Bear Arms Outlived Its Usefulness?
Let Anyone Take A Job Anywhere
For A Better Future, Live In A Red State
Should We Break Up The Big Banks?
Is The Two-Party System Making America Ungovernable?
Is The Two-Party System Making America Ungovernable?
Healthcare Retrospective
Is The U.S. Drone Program Fatally Flawed?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
In the Great Khan’s Tent
Visualize Meditations
The No-Frills Teacher Podcast
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast