Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
#102 - Should The U.S. Adopt The Right To Be Forgotten Online?
#101 - Are Liberals Stifling Intellectual Diversity?
#100 - Should The World Bet On America?
Tribute To David Carr
#99 - Is Amazon The Reader's Friend?
Retrospective On The Freedom Of Speech
#98 - Should We Genetically Modify Food?
#97 - Should We Legalize Assisted Suicide?
#96 - Does Income Inequality Impair The American Dream?
#95 - Mass Collection Of U.S. Phone Records Violates The Fourth Amendment
#94 - Will Flexing America's Muscles In The Middle East Make Things Worse?
#93 - Should We Embrace The Common Core?
Retrospective On Hamas And Israel
#92 - Is There A Constitutional Right To Unlimited Spending On Political Speech?
#91 - Is Death Final?
#90 - Do Millennials Stand A Chance?
The Controversy Over Ayaan Hirsi Ali At Brandeis University
#89 - More Clicks, Fewer Bricks: Is The Lecture Hall Obsolete?
Does Affirmative Action On Campus Do More Harm Than Good?
#88 - Is Russia A Marginal Power?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
In the Great Khan’s Tent
Visualize Meditations
The No-Frills Teacher Podcast
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast