Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
#122 - Has The President Usurped The Constitutional Power Of Congress?
#121 - Do Hunters Conserve Wildlife?
#120 - Eliminate Corporate Subsidies
#119 - Should We Trust The Promise Of Artificial Intelligence?
#118 - Is Free Speech Threatened On Campus?
#117 - Are Lifespans Long Enough?
#116 - Should The U.S. Let In 100,000 Syrian Refugees?
#115 - Does The Equal Protection Clause Forbid Racial Preferences In State University Admissions?
#114 - Can Central Banks Print Prosperity?
#113 - Do U.S. Prosecutors Have Too Much Power?
#112 - Should College Students Be Allowed To Take Smart Drugs?
#111 - Should We Raise The Federal Gas Tax To Fund Infrastructure?
Bonus Podcast: Is Death Final?
#110 - Are China And The U.S. Long-Term Enemies?
#109 - Should Courts Or Campuses Decide Sexual Assault Cases?
Bonus Podcast: Should We Abolish the Minimum Wage?
#108 - Does The U.S. Need To Defeat ISIS, Or Is Containment Enough?
Bonus Podcast: Israel Can Live With A Nuclear Iran
Bonus Podcast: Obamacare Is Now Beyond Rescue
Bonus Podcast: Men Are Finished
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
In the Great Khan’s Tent
Visualize Meditations
The No-Frills Teacher Podcast
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast