Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Legalize Drugs
Are The Rich Taxed Enough?
Should The Government Ration End Of Life Care?
Are Elected Islamists Better Than Dictators?
Are Super PACs Good For Democracy?
The Natural Gas Boom: Doing More Harm Than Good?
Should College Football Be Banned?
Is The Internet Closing Our Minds Politically?
Does China Do Capitalism Better Than America?
Is Obesity The Government's Business?
Should The U.N. Grant Palestine Full Membership?
#57 - Would The World Be Better Off Without Religion?
Should Congress Pass Obama's Jobs Bill In Pieces?
Do Too Many Kids Go To College?
Do Grandma's Benefits Imperil Junior's Future?
Are Men Finished?
Is It Time To End The War On Terror?
Does Freedom Of The Press Extend To State Secrets?
Should We Stop Taking The World's Huddled Masses?
Is It Time To Clip America's Global Wings?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Teachers Talk Radio
LifeBlood
Navigating Life After 40
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast