Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
#57 - Would The World Be Better Off Without Religion?
Should Congress Pass Obama's Jobs Bill In Pieces?
Do Too Many Kids Go To College?
Do Grandma's Benefits Imperil Junior's Future?
Are Men Finished?
Is It Time To End The War On Terror?
Does Freedom Of The Press Extend To State Secrets?
Should We Stop Taking The World's Huddled Masses?
Is It Time To Clip America's Global Wings?
Can Clean Energy Drive The Economic Recovery?
Is The Two-Party System Making The U.S. Ungovernable?
Should The Obama Health Care Law Be Repealed?
Should Airports Use Racial And Religious Profiling?
Is Afghanistan A Lost Cause?
Is Big Government Stifling The American Spirit?
Is Islam A Religion Of Peace?
Are Terrorists Criminals Or Enemy Combatants?
Has The Cyberwar Threat Been Exaggerated?
Does Obama's Foreign Policy Spell America's Decline?
Is Organic Food Stuffed Full Of Marketing Hype?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
In the Great Khan’s Tent
Visualize Meditations
The No-Frills Teacher Podcast
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast