Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Are Terrorists Criminals Or Enemy Combatants?
Has The Cyberwar Threat Been Exaggerated?
Does Obama's Foreign Policy Spell America's Decline?
Is Organic Food Stuffed Full Of Marketing Hype?
Are Teachers Unions To Blame For Failing Schools?
Should The U.S. Scale Back Relations With Israel?
Is California The First Failed State?
Is America To Blame For Mexico's Drug War?
Are Obama's Economic Policies Working Effectively?
Good Riddance To Mainstream Media?
Will 'Buy American' Policies Backfire?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Resilient Mind
Positive Thinking Mind
In the Great Khan’s Tent
The Mel Robbins Podcast
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast