Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
#155 - Unresolved: U.S. National Security
Join IQ2US Live in New York
#154 - Has Globalization Undermined the American Working Class?
#153 - Is Social Media Good For Democracy?
#152 - Trigger Warning: Are Safe Spaces Dangerous?
#151 - Will Automation Crash Democracy?
#150 - Can Negotiations Denuclearize North Korea?
#149 - Is Bitcoin More Than A Bubble?
#148 - Should Net Neutrality Be Saved?
#147 - As We Evolve, Do We Need God Less?
#146 - Does Humanitarian Intervention Do More Harm Than Good?
#145 - Have Dating Apps Killed Romance?
#144 - Unresolved: America's Economic Outlook
#143 - Do Liberals Hold the Moral High Ground?
Guns, Bibles, & Breaking Bread: A Thanksgiving Podcast
#142 - Should College Athletes Be Paid?
#141 - Is Western Democracy In Danger?
#140 - Is the U.S. Healthcare System Terminally Broken?
#139 - Face-Off with China: Foreign Policy in the Trump Era
How to Debate... Yourself.
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
In the Great Khan’s Tent
Visualize Meditations
The No-Frills Teacher Podcast
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast